You have no items in your shopping cart.

Ownership Retention Terms in Sale Contracts Gone Astray: PST Energy 7 Shipping v.O.w. Bunker Malta Limited
Pathak, Akhileshwar Case IIMA-BP0429 / Published February 21, 2019 / 11 pages. Collection: Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad
Format Price Quantity Select
PDF Download
$6.95
Printed Black & White Copy
$7.25

Product Overview

'Title retention Clause' was introduced in sale of goods contracts to prevent the transfer of ownership till the seller was fully paid. Exigencies of businesses have led to introduction of further clauses allowing the buyer to use or sub-sell the goods even before the transfer of ownership. The conflicting provisions, as the judgment of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in PST Energy 7 Shipping v O.W. Bunker Malta Limited brings out, changes the very character of the contract. The contract fails to be a contract of sale of goods depriving the parties of the valuable rights.



Learning Objectives

Transfer of ownership in a sale contract Strcuture and benefits of title retention clauses Disadvantage of title retention clauses


  • Videos List

  • Overview

    'Title retention Clause' was introduced in sale of goods contracts to prevent the transfer of ownership till the seller was fully paid. Exigencies of businesses have led to introduction of further clauses allowing the buyer to use or sub-sell the goods even before the transfer of ownership. The conflicting provisions, as the judgment of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in PST Energy 7 Shipping v O.W. Bunker Malta Limited brings out, changes the very character of the contract. The contract fails to be a contract of sale of goods depriving the parties of the valuable rights.

  • Learning Objectives

    Learning Objectives

    Transfer of ownership in a sale contract Strcuture and benefits of title retention clauses Disadvantage of title retention clauses