Business Case Studies & Business Publications

Helsing: In Defense of Integration

Ruediger, Stefan, ...

Case

Helsing: In Defense of Integration

Ruediger, Stefan; Saunders, Joshua

GEM-0260 | Published April 30, 2026 | 35 Pages Case

Collection: Darden School of Business

Add To Cart Buy Now

Product Details

Gundbert Scherf, cofounder and co-CEO of Helsing GmbH (Helsing), a German defense AI start-up, must advise senior German government officials on the future of European defense integration while simultaneously deciding his company’s strategic path. The case is set in October 2025, as Europe grapples with the war in Ukraine, questions about the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (NATO’s) reliability under a second Donald Trump administration in the United States, and the challenge of transforming fragmented national defense markets into a coherent European defense industrial base. The case employs two parallel analytical frameworks. First, fiscal-federalism theory evaluates whether defense should be provided at the EU level, examining economies of scale, positive security spillovers, and the preference heterogeneity that explains why integration has historically failed. Second, a crowding-in-versus-crowding-out framework analyzes the macroeconomic effects of increased defense spending, emphasizing how spending composition determines whether public investment stimulates or displaces private activity. These frameworks are complementary: Fiscal federalism diagnoses the institutional problem, while the crowding-in analysis determines whether proposed solutions are macroeconomically viable. This case was written for "EU in the World Economy," a second-year MBA elective at Darden. The course develops analytical frameworks for understanding European economic integration, and the case applies these tools to a contemporary policy and firm-level setting. Drawing on concepts introduced earlier in the course, including EU institutional design, the single market, the euro, and the EU banking union, the case invites students to evaluate how integration choices shape economic outcomes under uncertainty.

1. Apply fiscal-federalism criteria (economies of scale, spillovers, and preference heterogeneity) to evaluate EU-level defense provisions and explain why integration has failed despite clear theoretical justification. 2. Extend the crowding-out analysis into a crowding-in framework and analyze how spending composition determines whether public investment stimulates or displaces private activity, using IS-LM for interest rate effects and AD-AS for output and price-level implications. 3. Assess EU institutional instruments (Security Action for Europe [SAFE], the European Defence Mechanism [EDM], and the Capital Markets Union [CMU]) for their capacity to address fragmentation and create viable defense markets. 4. Synthesize the two parallel frameworks (fiscal federalism for institutional diagnosis and crowding-in analysis for macroeconomic feasibility) to formulate strategic recommendations for both policy (Germany) and firm strategy (Helsing).