You have no items in your shopping cart.

Clarence Hall University and the Donation
Parmar, Bidhan L.; Mead, Jenny; Combemale, Mallory; Purnell, Lauren Case E-0382 / Published September 24, 2012 / 9 pages.
Format Price Quantity Select
PDF Download
$6.75
Master Hard Copy
$7.00
Student Hard Copy
$7.00
Copyright Permissions
$3.75

Product Overview

Annalisa McGann, chair of London's prestigious Clarence Hall University, together with the university's board, must make a decision about whether to return a large monetary donation from the Natour Charitable Foundation, which was founded and run by a recent graduate who was also the son of the leader of a corrupt, authoritarian regime in an oil-rich region. Almost two-thirds of the money had already been invested in an innovative leukemia drug that could significantly increase patients' chances of survival; the remainder had been earmarked for an endowment fund for low-income students. Each course of action?keeping the money, giving back the entire sum, or returning the unspent money?had complex consequences, particularly in the current environment in which all British universities were suffering financially and there was nationwide student unrest over rising university costs. The British press, by uncovering the connection between Natour and Clarence Hall, had forced the administration's hand, and McGann and the board needed to make a quick decision after considering a number of complicating factors.

Learning Objectives

1. For students to practice making a difficult moral decision and justify it using moral frameworks. 2. For students to identify stakeholders and find strategies for successfully mitigating any harms that may occur. 3. For students to become familiar with the kinds of moral dilemmas that occur in an academic institution.

  • Overview

    Annalisa McGann, chair of London's prestigious Clarence Hall University, together with the university's board, must make a decision about whether to return a large monetary donation from the Natour Charitable Foundation, which was founded and run by a recent graduate who was also the son of the leader of a corrupt, authoritarian regime in an oil-rich region. Almost two-thirds of the money had already been invested in an innovative leukemia drug that could significantly increase patients' chances of survival; the remainder had been earmarked for an endowment fund for low-income students. Each course of action?keeping the money, giving back the entire sum, or returning the unspent money?had complex consequences, particularly in the current environment in which all British universities were suffering financially and there was nationwide student unrest over rising university costs. The British press, by uncovering the connection between Natour and Clarence Hall, had forced the administration's hand, and McGann and the board needed to make a quick decision after considering a number of complicating factors.

  • Learning Objectives

    Learning Objectives

    1. For students to practice making a difficult moral decision and justify it using moral frameworks. 2. For students to identify stakeholders and find strategies for successfully mitigating any harms that may occur. 3. For students to become familiar with the kinds of moral dilemmas that occur in an academic institution.